by Barbara Gauthier
[I have begun with a brief summary of the controversy that has developed over the past couple weeks involving Fr. Calvin Robinson, Bp. Ray Sutton and Abp. Steve Wood and whether Fr. Robinson should receive a temporary license to minister to his non-ACNA and now independent congregation during a period of discernment. If you’d prefer a more in-depth presentation, I’ve posted at the bottom all the primary documents involved, arranged chronologically so that you can read through them and get a fuller understanding of the situation and how it evolved.]
Last year, Fr. Calvin Robinson moved to the US to become the rector of a small Anglo-catholic parish in Grand Rapids. Michigan, which was affiliated with the Anglican Catholic Church. On January 25, Fr. Robinson spoke at the National Pro-Life Summit in Washington, DC, and was then vilified on social media for ending his presentation with what his accusers called a “fascist salute” and for being an “anti-semite.” (Robinson has stated that the salute was “a cheeky head nod” to Elon Musk and has since apologized).
Jeff Walton reports that less than a week later, Bp. Mark Haverland suspended Fr. Robinson’s license to minister in the Anglican Catholic Church on January 30 because he was “continuing to act as a political social media personality.” Fr. Robinson’s parish, St. Paul’s Anglican, continued to meet without Robinson able to preach or to celebrate public mass and on May 4, the congregation voted to separate from the ACC and posted on its website that it “is currently seeking another church body with which to affiliate.”
The very next day, May 5, the Bishop Ordinary of the REC’s Diocese of the Midwest, Bp. Ray Sutton, granted a temporary license to Fr. Calvin Robinson to provide him with episcopal covering as he and his congregation discern their future together.
“Be it known that I, Ray R. Sutton, a Bishop of the Reformed Episcopal Church, do hereby license our brother, the Rev. Calvin Robinson, to serve in Word and Sacrament at St. Paul’s Anglican Church in Grand Rapids, Michigan, such authorization to be in force for one year beginning the 5th day of May, 2025, unless revoked by me or my successor. “
A week later, on May 12, the ACNA communications teamposted a press release on the ACNA website announcing that
“Presiding Bishop Ray R. Sutton of The Reformed Episcopal Church Diocese of Mid-America, a sub-jurisdiction of the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA), recently granted a temporary license to allow The Rev. Calvin Robinson to serve at St. Paul’s Anglican Church in Grand Rapids, Michigan (a church not affiliated with the REC or ACNA) amid significant concerns about his fitness to serve within the Anglican Communion.”
These “significant concern”s appear to be based primarily on social media allegations of anti-semitic statements “in sympathy with anti-semitic groups” in addition to other improprieties:
“Rev. Robinson’s license to serve within the Anglican Catholic Church (ACC) was revoked on January 30, 2025, due to a variety of circumstances including an inappropriate gesture at a pro-life rally, allegedly making statements that were anti-semitic, or in sympathy with anti-semitic groups, and a habit of speaking rashly about a variety of sensitive topics.”
Embedded in the middle of the press release was a controversial quote from Abp. Steve Wood:
“I am concerned to have the Anglican Church of North America affiliated with a leader whose public comments and persona consistently fail to exhibit the love and grace of Jesus Christ,” said ACNA Archbishop Steve Wood. “I have concerns about Rev. Robinson’s ability to uphold the full commitments of our Anglican tradition, and his ability to model the Christ-like virtues of peace, patience, gentleness, goodness, and love, I know all of our permanent licensed clergy abide by in the daily exercise of their priestly duties. I do not personally believe The Rev. Robinson is a good representative of the Anglican Church in North America.”
Not surprisingly, the very next day, on May 13, REC member Mark Marshall posted an open letter to Abp. Steve Wood to express his concerns about the Archbishop’s public assessment of Fr. Robinson as someone who is un-Anglican and unable to model Christian virtues and who therefore does not belong in the ACNA.
“I was having a joyous week when I saw that Presiding Bishop Sutton of my Reformed Episcopal Church (REC) had granted temporary oversight to Fr. Calvin Robinson and his parish. Knowing both Bishop Sutton and Fr. Calvin and having seen and benefited from the pastoral qualities of both, I was glad for all parties. As I recalled, several bishops around the world gave many of us shelter when it was necessary to leave The Episcopal Church but we had not yet organized what became ACNA. So I thought it meet and right that now Bishop Sutton and the REC are giving shelter to Fr. Calvin and his parish as they discern how to proceed. I was downright proud actually. So, yes, I was rejoicing . . . until I read your press release.”
[…]
“First, love and truth go together. They must go together. And Fr. Calvin is a truth-teller. And that is drawing people. I’ve seen him at several conferences, and people, particularly young men, flock to him. It is not a kind of “winsomeness” or wokeness that is drawing these, but standing for what is right in a society that has gone so wrong… As for those who know him, his parish clearly wants to keep him when it would be all too convenient to part. He and his parish have remained committed to each other in the midst of forces trying to tear them apart.
“Seeing Fr. Calvin closehand, his availability to so many young and old (like me) amazes me. I would not have the energy for that! In these and other circumstances, I’ve seen him model peace, patience, gentleness, goodness, and love. To say that he instead ‘consistently fail(s) to exhibit the love and grace of Jesus Christ’ is bizarre, especially to us who know him but also to many others as well. Why engage in such a smear? Why so misuse your office?”
What troubles Marshall even more is Abp. Wood’s own personal belief that Calvin Robinson is not “a good representative of the Anglican Church in North America.” By dismissing Calvin Robinson as unfit for the ACNA, the Archbishop’s negative pronouncement could have far-reaching ramifications for the future:
“So you have prejudged and misjudged Fr. Calvin. But the problem with your statement is much bigger. The potential harm is much greater.
“When you say that Calvin Robinson does not belong in ACNA, you tell many others they don’t belong in ACNA either. You particularly tell the young based men who are suddenly going to church that they would be better off in another church. That is surely not your intent. But that is what your statement communicates.
“You’ve just made the task of attracting and retaining sound orthodox people that much more difficult for me and for many ACNA priests and parishes.”
Marshall suggests that Abp. Wood might do well to reassess his position: “Fr. Calvin has apologized publicly for a past error or two. It is time for you to do likewise. It is urgent you do likewise.”
Also on May 13, George Conger conveyed much the same take as Mark Marshall in Anglican Unscripted episode #914: Calvin Robinson in the ACNA. Beginning at marker 16:31, this 22-minute analysis by George Conger and Kevin Kalsen provides a truly excellent commentary on the background of Fr. Calvin Robinson, beginning with his time as an ordinand in the Diocese of London under Bp. Sarah Mullally. They also give an insightful historical overview of how the ACNA has chosen to handle internal affairs like this in the past as well as present. An ABSOLUTE MUST MUST WATCH. Here are just a few of the numerous notable quotes from this episode:
“Ray Sutton is basically being accused of fomenting division within the ACNA by bringing on a controversial cleric and giving him eposciopal oversight. This letter does not come off as considered, wise or irenic This does not build the unity of the ACNA in any way, shape or form. It is almost written as ‘I have a loud noisy group within my constituency who don’t like Calvin’s ultramontane catholicism and don’t like his stance on women. So I’m going to placate the Protestant group and I’m going to placate the feminist group or the women’s group’. This is a major error that could very well start the unraveling…”
“This letter was a mistake. It was an error. First off, there are clergy in the C4SO and a few in other places who deserve this type of letter. Calvin does not deserve this type of letter — nor does any clergy person not directly a member of +Steve Wood’s diocese. He has no business writing about an individual clergy person under the authority of another bishop.”
“I wish this could have been handled in a prayerful, godly and loving way.”
On May 14, Bp Ray Sutton informed Calvin Robinson via X/Twitter that he was withdrawing his licensure effective immediately.
Dear Fr. Calvin:
After much prayer and counsel from fellow bishops, who have not required me to revoke licensure, I have decided that I must withdraw it effective this day. My secretary (copied) is currently out of town. She will provide the document in the next few days that states removal of licensure. Thank you for your kind and obedient service in the short time you have been under my licensure. I wish you every best in the service of our Lord.
Sincerely in Christ,
Later that same day, George Conger posted on Anglican Ink a succinct and frank analysis, noting that Abp. Wood had shown disrespect not only for Fr. Robinson but for one of his bishops as well.
“Yesterday’s unprecedented letter by the ACNA primate drew sharply negative responses on social media, and raised questions about the propriety and canonical legitimacy of his actions in rubbishing a priest not under his ecclesial authority, and chastising a fellow member of the college of bishops.
“The latest development in the Calvin Robinson saga will doubtless further inflame commentators dissatisfied with what some see as a two-tier system of justice at play within the ACNA.”
The next day, May 15, Calvin Robinson posted his response:
A few hours later, Anne Kennedy at Stand Firm surmised rather astutely what had probably taken place behind the scenes:
“Bishop Sutton must have acted on his own, and then, receiving pushback, changed his mind. And this, it must be said plainly, is humiliating for everyone in the ACNA, but especially for Bishop Sutton, never mind hard on Calvin Robinson. Having done the deed, it is better to stick by it, come what may. “
By May 20, the dust had began to settle and in Anglican Unscripted episode #915: Calvin Robinson’s Groundhog Day, beginning at marker 26:00, Kevin Kalsen and George Conger provide a 24-minute post-mortem analysis of what happened, how the matter was handled/mishandled, and what could have been done better. They end with some speculations on what the future may hold for Fr. Robinson and his congregation. Their takeaway:
“What we have here is called an unforced error. Every Archbishop of the ACNA has had one. At some point you are brought up to a brand new situation and how you respond is so vacated to the entire world through social media that you have to be so careful of what you say, how you say it and why you say it.”
“Everyone involved is a man of integrity — Ray Sutton, Calvin Robinson and Steve Wood… and the system has let them down.”
On May 23, another post-mortem assessment was posted by Stand Firm, this time a 45-minute podcast analysis entitled #257: Conduct Unbecoming? Calvin Robinson and Representing the ACNA.
On this episode of the Stand Firm podcast, Matt [Kennedy], Jady, and Nick discuss the recent controversy surrounding Calvin Robinson, talk about pastors engaging online, and wonder about who actually represents the ACNA.
My own take away from all this is the realization that the Church has always been a bit messy — just ask Paul about his experiences with Peter in the church of Antioch or his differences with Barnabas over the suitability of John Mark as a member of his missionary team. Yet both of those disagreements were ultimately resolved and relationships which were broken, reconciled and restored: Peter supporting Paul and his mission to the Gentiles at the Council of Jerusalem (Acts 15:7-12) and Paul commending John Mark and wanting this cousin of Barnabas to come help him in his later years (2 Timothy 4:11).
One thing that can be said for certain is that the Church is always providing us with manifold opportunities for growing in grace and allowing the Holy Spirit, through them, to chisel us down ever more fully into the image of Jesus (2 Corinthians 3:18).
I think Conger was spot on in his assessment that “everyone involved is a man of integrity” — Ray Sutton, Calvin Robinson, Steve Wood.
And those other Christ-like “virtues of peace, patience, gentleness, goodness, and love” mentioned by Abp. Wood, (along with humility, kindness, joy, faithfulness, hope, compassion, self-control, and perseverance), can only be developed by living in community with others. As our rough edges rub against others’ rough edges, we are all living stones in the process of being shaped by the Lord in order to be fit together smoothly in the building up of his spiritual house.
May this prove to be yet another such opportunity for growing in grace and honing virtues.
Barbara
PRIMARY DOCUMENTS (in chronological order):
May 5License to Serve — Bp. Ray Sutton (Diocese of the Midwest, REC)
THE REFORMED EPISCOPAL CHURCH
DIOCESE OF MID-AMERICA
A Founding Member of the Province of the ANGLICAN CHURCH IN NORTH AMERICA
LICENSE TO SERVE
IN WORD AND SACRAMENT
Be it known that I, Ray R. Sutton, a Bishop of the Reformed Episcopal Church, do hereby license our brother, the Rev. Calvin Robinson, to serve in Word and Sacrament at St. Paul’s Anglican Church in Grand Rapids, Michigan, such authorization to be in force for one year beginning the 5th day of May, 2025, unless revoked by me or my successor.
The Most Rev. Ray R. Sutton, OrdinaryControversial Cleric Calvin Robinson — Jeff Walton (Juicy Ecumenism)https://juicyecumenism.com/2025/05/14/calvin-robinson/
A polemical clergyman with a fiercely devoted online following and a history of burned bridges is once again preaching and celebrating the eucharist after receiving a license to minister by a bishop of the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA), to the concern of the denomination’s archbishop.
Robinson’s license to minister was suspended on January 30 by the ACC, a small Anglo-Catholic denomination, following a speaking engagement at the National Pro-Life Summit in Washington, D.C. At the event, Robinson mimicked businessman and presidential advisor Elon Musk in offering a salute that detractors claim is fascist (Robinson has stated that the salute was “a cheeky head nod” and has since apologized). ACC Archbishop Mark Haverland quickly revoked Robinson’s license on the grounds that the priest was “continuing to act as a political social media personality” after numerous private admonishments and “that such activity was inconsistent with priestly ministry.”
Robinson’s parish, St. Paul’s Anglican in Grand Rapids, Michigan, continued without Robinson able to preach or to celebrate public mass. On May 4, the congregation voted to separate from the ACC and “is currently seeking another church body with which to affiliate” according to the parish website.
On May 5, Reformed Episcopal Church (REC) Presiding Bishop Ray Sutton issued a license for Robinson to minister, which began circulating on X (formerly Twitter) on Monday, May 12.
In a telephone interview with IRD, Sutton confirmed the license and stated that he had agreed to provide personal episcopal oversight to St. Paul’s Anglican Church while the congregation determines its future affiliation. Sutton stated that Robinson was ordained to the diaconate by the REC’s sister church, the Free Church of England, and that he has a “temporary” license to minister, but is still on the rolls of the Anglican Catholic Church. The REC bishop clarified that neither the parish nor Robinson have joined the REC or, by extension, the ACNA of which the REC is a founding jurisdiction.
May 12
Abp. Steve Wood Expresses Concern Over Temporary Licensure of Calvin Robinson — ACNA Press Release
ghttps://anglicanchurch.net/archbishop-woods-statement-about-rev-calvin-robinson/ — Archbishop Steve Wood circulated the following statement to the ACNA College of Bishops on the evening of May 12:
Archbishop Steve Wood Expresses Concern Over Temporary Licensure of Rev. Calvin Robinson to the Reformed Episcopal Church (REC)
Mt. Pleasant, S.C.— Presiding Bishop Ray R. Sutton of The Reformed Episcopal Church Diocese of Mid-America, a sub-jurisdiction of the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA), recently granted a temporary license to allow The Rev. Calvin Robinson to serve at St. Paul’s Anglican Church in Grand Rapids, Michigan (a church not affiliated with the REC or ACNA) amid significant concerns about his fitness to serve
within the Anglican Communion.
Rev. Robinson’s license to serve within the Anglican Catholic Church (ACC) was revoked on January 30, 2025, due to a variety of circumstances including an inappropriate gesture at a pro-life rally, allegedly making statements that were anti-semitic, or in sympathy with anti-semitic groups, and a habit of speaking rashly about a variety of sensitive topics. This led the ACC to conclude in its public statement dated February 6, 2025, “[Rev.] Robinson demonstrated repeatedly that he lacks the temperament and prudence needed in a parish priest.”
Due to changes in Rev. Robinsons’s licensure, on May 4, 2025 St. Paul’s Anglican Church in Grand Rapids, Michigan voted to disaffiliate itself with the ACC and requested for Bishop Ray Sutton of the REC, Diocese of Mid-America, to grant a temporary license to Robinson to minister while the church determines its future affiliation. Bishop Sutton agreed to provide personal oversight of the Church during this interim season and has emphasized that Rev. Robinson has not been admitted as a member of the REC or the ACNA.
“I am concerned to have the Anglican Church of North America affiliated with a leader whose public comments and persona consistently fail to exhibit the love and grace of Jesus Christ,” said ACNA Archbishop Steve Wood. “I have concerns about Rev. Robinson’s ability to uphold the full commitments of our Anglican tradition, and his ability to model the Christ-like virtues of peace, patience, gentleness, goodness, and love, I know all of our permanent licensed clergy abide by in the daily exercise of their priestly duties. I do not personally believe The Rev. Robinson is a good representative of the Anglican Church in North America.”
The Rev. Robinson’s temporary license to serve in word and sacrament was signed on May 5, granting him eligibility to minister for one calendar year unless further action is taken.
May 13
An Open Letter to Archbishop Steve — Mark Marshall
https://markmarshall.substack.com/p/an-open-letter-to-archbishop-steve
Dear Archbishop Wood,
We in the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA) are having an interesting week, aren’t we? I was having a joyous one when I saw that Presiding Bishop Sutton of my Reformed Episcopal Church (REC) had granted temporary oversight to Fr. Calvin Robinson and his parish. Knowing both Bishop Sutton and Fr. Calvin and having seen and benefited from the pastoral qualities of both, I was glad for all parties.
As I recalled, several bishops around the world gave many of us shelter when it was necessary to leave The Episcopal Church but we had not yet organized what became ACNA. So I thought it meet and right that now Bishop Sutton and the REC are giving shelter to Fr. Calvin and his parish as they discern how to proceed. I was downright proud actually. So, yes, I was rejoicing . . . until I read your press release.
I am probably being a bad Anglican by responding to you, the Archbishop of my province, so publicly. But your statement itself was public and attacks a friend, not to mention giving inadequate respect to my bishop, also a friend and a bishop who has served ACNA and the whole of Christ’s Church well. And there are worse things than being a bad Anglican, so I will proceed.
I completely understand the need to clarify the situation in a timely fashion, to let those concerned know the oversight is a temporary situation that does not prejudge whether Fr. Calvin and his parish is a good fit for us or we for them. There was some confusion, and some of the easily upset were upset. A succinct positive statement would have been therefore helpful.
I am less understanding of your unnecessary and unhelpful statements about Fr. Calvin himself. You pretty much did prejudge, in the second paragraph then especially in the penultimate paragraph:
“I am concerned to have the Anglican Church of North America affiliated with a leader whose public comments and persona consistently fail to exhibit the love and grace of Jesus Christ,” said ACNA Archbishop Steve Wood. “I have concerns about Rev. Robinson’s ability to uphold the full commitments of our Anglican tradition, and his ability to model the Christ-like virtues of peace, patience, gentleness, goodness, and love, I know all of our permanent licensed clergy abide by in the daily exercise of their priestly duties. I do not personally believe The Rev. Robinson is a good representative of the Anglican Church in North America.”
Where to begin in responding to that? But I will give it a try.
First, love and truth go together. They must go together. And Fr. Calvin is a truth-teller. And that is drawing people. I’ve seen him at several conferences, and people, particularly young men, flock to him. It is not a kind of “winsomeness” or wokeness that is drawing these, but standing for what is right in a society that has gone so wrong.
Or course, Fr. Calvin is not alone in so drawing people to the Faith. We are in a time of opportunity. “The fields are white for harvest.” Traditional churches are seeing an increase in young people, particularly young men, because they desire Truth in the midst of a society that feeds them lies. They are not interested in milktoast Christian leaders who are careful to avoid offending the easily offended. They are drawn to leaders who are both bold in telling the truth and have the time to listen and discuss. Fr. Calvin meets that need well.
Your statement instead risks repelling the very sort of truth-seeking young people that Fr. Calvin attracts. I’m already aware of one ACNA priest who has gotten a concerned phone call from such a young man in his parish. What kind of message does it send to such earnest men to issue your statement when the ink on Fr. Calvin’s license is barely dry?
Seeing Fr. Calvin closehand, his availability to so many young and old (like me) amazes me. I would not have the energy for that! In these and other circumstances, I’ve seen him model peace, patience, gentleness, goodness, and love. To say that he instead “consistently fail(s) to exhibit the love and grace of Jesus Christ” is bizarre, especially to us who know him but also to many others as well. Why engage in such a smear? Why so misuse your office?
As for those who know him, his parish clearly wants to keep him when it would be all too convenient to part. He and his parish have remained committed to each other in the midst of forces trying to tear them apart.
So you have prejudged and misjudged Fr. Calvin. But the problem with your statement is much bigger. The potential harm is much greater.
When you say that Calvin Robinson does not belong in ACNA, you tell many others they don’t belong in ACNA either. You particularly tell the young based men who are suddenly going to church that they would be better off in another church. That is surely not your intent. But that is what your statement communicates.
I often communicate with those interested in ACNA or in finding an Anglican church. I’ve lost count of the times I’ve had to explain away statements and practices of this and that ACNA cleric. I’ve oft explained that ACNA is mixed but as a whole orthodox. But how can I and others credibly explain away a statement from the Archbishop himself? You’ve just made the task of attracting and retaining sound orthodox people that much more difficult for me and for many ACNA priests and parishes.
“Anglican” is already becoming a byword for timidity and wokeness. You and I know that is neither accurate nor fair. But that is how too many already see us regardless.
Again, that is not your intent. Feeding that perception is not your intent. So I beg you: apologize and retract the statement. Wish Fr. Calvin and his parish God’s best whatever they eventually decide. Thank Bishop Sutton for making his oversight and his excellent pastoral abilities available to Fr. Calvin and St. Paul’s Anglican when there are so many demands on him already.
Fr. Calvin has apologized publicly for a past error or two. It is time for you to do likewise. It is urgent you do likewise.
Have a blessed remainder of the Easter season.
Mark Marshall#914 Calvin Robinson in the ACNA — Kevin Kalsen and George Conger (Anglican Unscripted)
22-minute segment beginning at 16:31 — an excellent commentary on both the background of Fr. Robinson and the history of how the ACNA has chosen to handle its internal affairs in the past and at present
May 14
Withdrawal of License to Serve — Bp. Ray Sutton, Diocese of the Midwest (REC)
Dear Fr. Calvin:
After much prayer and counsel from fellow bishops, who have not required me to revoke licensure, I have decided that I must withdraw it effective this day. My secretary (copied) is currently out of town. She will provide the document in the next few days that states removal of licensure. Thank you for your kind and obedient service in the short time you have been under my licensure. I wish you every best in the service of our Lord.
Sincerely in Christ,
The Most Rev. Dr. Ray Sutton
Ordinary Calvin Robinson Out of the REC — George Conger (Anglican Ink)
Yesterday’s unprecedented letter by the ACNA primate drew sharply negative responses on social media, and raised questions about the propriety and canonical legitimacy of his actions in rubbishing a priest not under his ecclesial authority, and chastising a fellow member of the college of bishops. The latest development in the Calvin Robinson saga will doubtless further inflame commentators dissatisfied with what some see as a two-tier system of justice at play within the ACNA.
The license granted to the Rev. Calvin Robinson by the Rt. Rev. Ray Sutton of the Reformed Episcopal Church has been withdrawn, after the Archbishop of the Anglican Church in North America denounced Fr. Robinson as un-Anglican and ungovernable.
On 14 May 2025, Bishop Sutton wrote to Fr. Robinson, stating that with reluctance he was withdrawing the license, but emphasized he was not compelled to abandon the young priest. The action leaves Fr. Robinson without episcopal oversight at this time. In sharing the news with colleagues, Fr. Robinson commented: “I am done, brother.”
Yesterday’s unprecedented letter by the ACNA primate drew sharply negative responses on social media, and raised questions about the propriety and canonical legitimacy of his actions in rubbishing a priest not under his ecclesial authority, and chastising a fellow member of the college of bishops.
The latest development in the Calvin Robinson saga will doubtless further inflame commentators dissatisfied with what some see as a two-tier system of justice at play within the ACNA.
May 15
Calvin Robinson and the Vibe that Shifted — Anne Kennedy (Stand Firm)
https://annekennedy.substack.com/p/calvin-robinson-and-the-vibe-that
I had half of a post going yesterday with a round-up of pieces about Calvin Robinson—RNS, Jeff Walton, and Mark Marshall’s open letter—but around bedtime here in the Northeast, Robinson posted this and then erased his Twitter:
So, I’m gathering that my desire to see the texting thread I assumed must be in existence was a vain one, as there must have been no communication ahead of time between bishops of the ACNA. Bishop Sutton must have acted on his own, and then, receiving pushback, changed his mind. And this, it must be said plainly, is humiliating for everyone in the ACNA, but especially for Bishop Sutton, never mind hard on Calvin Robinson. Having done the deed, it is better to stick by it, come what may. What is this called? Ah, yes, A Failure of Nerve.May 20#915 Calvin Robinson’s Groundhog Day — Kevin Kalsen and George Conger (Anglican Unscripted)
24-minute segment beginning at 26:00 — post-analysis of how the matter was handled/mishandled, what could have been done better, and speculation on what the future may hold for Fr. Robinson and his congregation. May 23 #257: Conduct Unbecoming? Calvin Robinson and Representing the ACNA — Matt Kennedy et al. (Stand Firm)https://standfirminfaith.com/257-conduct-unbecoming-calvin-robinson-and-representing-the-acna/
On this episode of the Stand Firm podcast, Matt [Kennedy], Jady, and Nick discuss the recent controversy surrounding Calvin Robinson, talk about pastors engaging online, and wonder about who actually represents the ACNA.
Received by email and reproduced with permission