from The Washington Times
Britain’s charities regulator is assessing concerns over an Amnesty International report that branded a women’s charity founded by “Harry Potter” author J.K. Rowling as “anti-rights.”
The briefing, titled “A Growing Threat: The Anti-Rights Movement in the UK,” listed more than 100 organizations under categories including “gender critical,” among them Ms. Rowling’s Beira’s Place in Edinburgh, a free, confidential support service for women 16 and older across Edinburgh and the Lothians who have survived sexual violence. The document appeared on Amnesty UK’s website before being pulled down amid backlash, according to a report from the Scottish Daily Express.
Ms. Rowling, 60, has been a prominent gender-critical campaigner and has previously drawn accusations of transphobia for her stance on trans activism. She founded Beira’s Place in 2022 and has spoken publicly about surviving domestic abuse and sexual assault.
Lawyers for Beira’s Place sent Amnesty UK a letter threatening legal action, accusing it of defamation and demanding an apology, permanent withdrawal of the briefing and an external review, according to the Express, which reported that staff at the Edinburgh center had received threatening correspondence following publication. Amnesty International UK’s charitable arm also filed a serious incident report with the Charity Commission, while Beira’s Place and other organizations separately raised concerns with the regulator. A Charity Commission spokesperson confirmed it is assessing those concerns. The commission said it can confirm concerns have been raised with it about a briefing published by Amnesty International UK Charitable Trust. As of Friday, the commission had not opened a formal investigation
Amnesty has said the briefing was posted without going through its normal internal review process. The organization said it remains committed to gender justice, including the rights of women and trans people, according to Newsweek.
Beira’s Place chief executive Lesley Johnston called the charity’s inclusion on the list “inexplicable” and said it was deeply offensive to staff and to the women who use the service, according to PinkNews.