- 1,300 amendments in the House of Lords show the poor quality of its drafting and strength of criticism
- Attempting to drive contentious bills through parliament for a second time is highly unlikely to yield the desired result
- The Royal College of Psychiatrists, disability charities and hospices said the bill was not fit for purpose
- Supporters of assisted dying are seeking to present the situation as a struggle between the Commons and the Lords……because assisted dying was not in Labour’s manifesto, it enjoys no mandate. Detailed scrutiny is the job of the Lords
- Using the Parliament Acts would be wrong… a constitutional outrage
- Andy Burnham …. has expressed scepticism about it. Wes Streeting….is adamantly opposed
Read The Times (£) here https://www.thetimes.com/comment/