When Poppy became Alex – a cautionary tale

Mar 27, 2023 by

by Julie Sandilands, TCW:

[…] Now, whilst the Alex and Jane scenario is a hypothetical one, it is not improbable given that:

1.    Teachers and other adults from outside agencies are seen as figures of authority and as such, opinions stated as facts are rarely challenged, influencing a child to explore ideas they might not have otherwise considered which perhaps could go some way in explaining the rising number of children with gender issues.

2.    Not all children are taken into care because of poor parenting. Children who feel that their relationship with their parents has irrevocably broken down can follow Alex’s example, leaving parents in the most difficult of situations trying to appease both their child and the appointed social worker in the hope of keeping the child under their roof and retaining full parental responsibility.

3.    Once a child is in care, and depending on the type of care order in place, parental responsibility is weakened, and as it states in the Starting Guide, can be bypassed by local authorities and/or treating clinicians.

In a recent article for the Telegraph discussing gender ideology and the sinister turn of events in the  American state of Minnesota, Julie Bindel lays bare her concerns for both children and their parents: ‘Where exactly will this end up? If the state decrees that that allowing children access to surgery and irreversible hormones is “life-saving healthcare”, what will happen to those parents that oppose their child’s demands to medically transition? The logical next step would be removal of the child from their parents. These zealots must be stopped in their tracks before more children’s lives are ruined.’

Who are these ‘zealots’ and why are they so determined to promote a potentially harmful agenda? And then, the same ‘zealots’, after exerting such influence over susceptible young minds, are usually nowhere to be seen when things go wrong or adulthood dawns and the magic money tree loses its leaves. For anyone who wishes to understand more fully the reasoning and motivations behind the individuals and organisations involved in the LBGTQ+ movement, the podcast Let’s talk Social Work – therapy in name only is an excellent resource to help draw your own conclusions.

Whatever you decide, one thing is clear: for those heavily involved in promoting gender and identity politics, the financial stakes are high. The availability of funding is significant and comes in from all directions as Janice Davis pointed out in her article on this site. The TaxPayers’ Alliance has since revealed that the LGBT+ rights charity Stonewall continues to receive an annual £1,221,222 from public bodies. Indeed, the glossary in the Starting Guide is provided by Stonewall. The charity BBC Children in Need is currently funding 37 projects to the value of more than £2.6millionspecifically focused on young people affected by issues of sexual identity and gender identity.

Read here

 

Related Posts

Tags

Share This