Double-oh dear
How can Keir Starmer want a female James Bond when he can’t even define what a woman is?
Keir Starmer has called for the next James Bond to be female and women across the country are overcome with joy to be thought of so highly. This is what we care about: the right to represent a franchise which is well past its sell-by-date.
Jokes aside, this is yet another example of how lost the Labour Party has become when it comes to dealing with its “woman problem”. Newsflash: women care about James Bond as much as Starmer appears to care about their rights.
It is baffling that a former barrister and QC has become so blind to objective truth and reality. This is the same man who thinks that saying “only women have a cervix” is “not right and shouldn’t be said”.
Not only is this unsettlingly authoritarian, it is ridiculous to anyone who refuses to be bamboozled by trans orthodoxy. In case it hasn’t already been made clear, only women (adult human females) have cervixes. This is all pretty standard, entry-level biology. Was Starmer this imprecise as Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor? I suspect not. Surely clear and intelligible laws led to him moving intelligible and clear prosecutions. So why is he now determined to spout gobbledegook?
Women have grown increasingly weary of the nonsense peddled by Labour. Declaring that the next James Bond should be female feels like a desperate attempt to woo us over. But how can Keir Starmer want a female James Bond when he can’t even define who and what a woman is?
Please right-click links to open in a new window.
Related Posts
Tags
Share This
