The cancellation of Christians

In a free society, disagreements over moral and religious questions do not usually prevent us from living peaceably and respectfully with one another. Unless, that is, your religious beliefs come into conflict with the LGBT lobby.

This is what King Lawal, a Conservative councillor for North Northamptonshire, recently discovered. Last June, he tweeted his Christian belief that the idea of Pride – of taking pride in one’s sexual identity – ‘is a sin, not a virtue’.

For this single tweet, Lawal was subjected to a brutal cancellation campaign and his life was turned upside down. He was suspended by his local party, allegedly at the behest of Conservative Campaign Headquarters. A local charity asked him to step down as a board member. A local authority threatened not to renew a contract with his business unless he resigned as its director. Seven organisations in total tried to cancel Lawal.

Lawal’s treatment exposed the parlous state of free speech and tolerance in modern Britain. But what has happened since offers some cause for hope. Lawal launched a legal action in July, claiming that his right to freedom of speech had been violated. By October, he had been reinstated by his local Conservative group and restored to various board positions. Last month, a Conservative Party disciplinary subcommittee exonerated him. Its judgement concluded that his comments ‘are a representation of his religious beliefs, which he is free and entitled to hold’. While some might find Lawal’s views ‘offensive’, the panel concluded that they are not ‘discriminatory or homophobic’.

Baseless attacks on freedom of speech, especially Christians’ freedom of speech, have become disturbingly common in recent years. Two months ago, Police Scotland were forced to pay Angus Cameron, a street preacher wrongly arrested for a ‘homophobic’ hate crime, nearly £15,000 in compensation. Other preachers and pastors across the UK – such as Oluwole Ilesanmi, John Sherwood and David McConnell – have been similarly vindicated following wrongful arrests. As has Anthony Stevens, a colleague of Lawal’s, who was arrested last summer for an alleged hate crime after sharing a video of Oluwole’s arrest. Last December, the police dropped their case against Stevens.

All these cases tell us something important. Though Britain’s laws against hate speech are troubling, the truth is that those voicing unpopular religious views rarely end up being convicted of anything. Police forces often barge in and make an arrest, only to realise later that they lack even the semblance of a case.

It’s not just the police who seem to have a wildly inaccurate understanding of the law. As King Lawal discovered, too many organisations and businesses seem to think that they too have some sort of legal obligation to punish people for expressing unpopular views. Or perhaps they are just too cowardly to stand up for free speech.

Read here